Tag: relationships

  • Are You Playing the Right Games in Your Life?

    Are You Playing the Right Games in Your Life?

    A fascinating book that I read recently was The Status Game by Will Storr. I have enjoyed reading a few of his prior books too, including Selfie and The Science of Storytelling.

    In it, Storr says that it is impossible to not be part of some hierarchies. In other words, we can’t go through life without having a sense that we are competing against other people in some areas of our lives.

    This is what he means by games. Not just basketball, monopoly, or poker. A game is anything where there is a set of rules about how things should be. Based on this, it is possible to get a sense of if you are doing well, winning, or losing.

    “The fastest person on the planet” is a game that has been played better by Usain Bolt than anyone else ever. Michael Phelps is at the top of the “best swimmer of all-time” hierarchy. Whilst I had some moments when I was younger when I did Little Athletics and swam competitively, I’m not trying to play either of these games these days. Therefore, I don’t really care about where I am in either of these hierarchies.

    Joe Rogan has been at the top of the “most listened to podcast” hierarchy for a while now with his Joe Rogan Experience. I wouldn’t mind having a few more listeners and some of the financial security that comes along with it, but being at the top of that game is really not what I’m aiming at either.

    I podcast because I like to have a creative outlet and share some of my insights with people who may be interested. It’s also fun to be sharing the project with one of my closest mates who I don’t get to see as often as I would like to anymore. Therefore, as long as I am making and putting out a podcast episode once a month, I’m happy with the game I am playing.

    Bernard Arnault is currently winning the game of the “richest person in the world” with $208.7 billion. Being high up on that hierarchy sure wouldn’t be important to Will MacAskill, who is an effective altruist and author of the excellent 2015 book Doing Good Better. He committed a while back to donating to charity all money that he makes every year beyond £24,000. Being the richest person in the world would be even less important to a Monk that has given away all of his earthly possessions and is spending his life in a monastery.

    When it comes to money for me, all I am aiming for is a healthy and happy life. If the money I am making and saving allows me to do that, I feel like I am winning. Especially if I get to live in a sustainable way where I am not too stressed, helping some people in my work and connecting with the people that are most important to me outside of it.

    I might not have as many fancy things as Kim Kardashian, or get to travel into space like Jeff Bezos, but I am also glad that I am not like either of them in these ways and many others too. Because I am not competing against them for things or money, we are not playing the same games, I am not lower in the hierarchy of those games, and I do not have to feel worse about myself.

    It is only when I am not being the person that I want to be, and I can see that others are living the life that I want better than I am that I experience feeling lower in the hierarchy and worse off. The moment I can make the necessary changes to start living my life consistently with my core values, the more I am playing the games that are really important to me, the better I am doing and the more satisfied I am likely to feel.

    At the end of The Status Game, Storr shares what he says are the core rules of status games to keep in mind so that you can improve your life and be protected from potential traps and danger. Sometimes certain dreams can be persuasive, but it doesn’t mean that striving toward something will necessarily give you what you need. I’d like to summarise these for you here.

    Photo by Marc on Pexels.com

    Seven Rules of the Status Game

    Rule 1: Practice warmth, sincerity, and competence

    These three components are essential if you want to optimally present yourself to others and successfully play a status game. If another person is trying to gauge what type of person you are, they are most likely to assess you to see if you are a kind person, if you are genuine, and if you know what you are talking about and are good at what you do.

    If you have competence, sincerity, and warmth in whatever it is that is important to you, others will know that you will not try to dominate them, that you will treat them fairly, and that you will probably be able to help them.

    Rule 2: Make small moments of prestige, not dominance.

    Wherever you can, try to create win-win situations, where you are trying to benefit both yourself and the other person in an interaction. If you are trying to win by making the other person lose or be worse off, it can lead to a worse reputation for who you are over time.

    Try to be respectful to others, even if you disagree about something. Be gracious and thankful for the efforts that they have put in. You might not always get what you want if you conduct yourself in this way. However, both parties will leave the situation feeling better about who you are as a person, including yourself. If you take care of developing your character in the ways you would like, your reputation is likely to speak for itself over time.

    Rule 3: Play a hierarchy of games and resist tyranny.

    Whichever game you are playing, try to see if you can notice how status is awarded. If higher-status people are the most obedient ones, believe more strongly in the dogma, and are most concerned with defeating the enemies or non-believers, you may be caught up in tyranny. Tyrannies are virtue dominance games.

    To best protect yourself from becoming too caught up in tyranny, try to play a wide diversity of games and have different aspects to your identity.

    If someone’s identity is entirely tied up with being a good Democrat or a good Republican, it can be hard to go against anything that their party stands for. However, if your political beliefs are only a small part of who you are, it may be a lot easier to disagree with the party that you usually support on a particular topic.

    Storr says that life is easier when we organize it as a hierarchy of games. By choosing what is most important to you, and then putting effort into these different things in a proportional way, you are likely to obtain a lot of meaning in your life.

    Rule 4: Reduce your moral sphere.

    Where you can, try not to spend too much time judging other people for what they do. Instead, turn your focus to your own life and behaviors, and see if you are being the person that you want to be. It is so much easier to judge other people for falling short than putting in the consistent effort to improve yourself in the ways that you would like to.

    If someone else is playing a game that doesn’t matter to you, why do you need to judge them? They might have different values from you and are okay with the choices they are making. Isn’t it more important to find out if you are living consistently with your values?

    Rule 5: Foster a trade-off mindset.

    One of the quickest ways to poison the empathy we have towards someone or something is to become moralistic about it. The truth of most matters is often more complex than you realise if you only think about it as right or wrong.

    If you can, try not to view the world in terms of heroes and villains, but different groups negotiating trade-offs. Most people are simply wanting what they perceive is the best for themselves, their family, or their group.

    Pain is pain, regardless of who it is happening to. If you perceive someone as an enemy, try to understand the pain that they are in. Also, see if you can see the games that they are playing in an attempt of gaining status and feeling less pain.

    If you can understand why someone is doing something, even if you would never want to play their game or see it as valid, it may be easier to remain compassionate or empathetic towards them. We need to all fight the bigotry that exists on both sides, and see if it is possible to reduce pain and improve the quality of life for all.

    Rule 6: Be different.

    It’s not easy to play a status game, nor is it often rewarding. If there can only be one winner, it can make everyone else feel worse off. Especially if you’re living in a more individualistic culture. If you live in a more collectivist culture, if anyone in your group has success, it can be possible to feel some of that success yourself too.

    There is another way towards feeling good about yourself rather than continuing to try to be perfect or better than everyone else at something. That is through having the courage and determination to live by your own values and do your own thing, regardless of what everyone else says is important.

    It may be tough to not conform if you feel a lot of external pressure to do what everyone else is doing. However, minor acts of non-conformity that do not violate the core standards of the group can attract attention rather than make you an outcast. As long as you remain helpful and useful to the group at times, you can rise in your status rather than being ostracised.

    Being original also makes it very difficult for others to compete with you. Keep trying to be yourself rather than trying to be perfect. No one else is ever going to be as good at being you as you are, no matter how hard they try.

    Rule 7: Never forget your dreaming.

    At the end of the day, most things are not as important as people think when they are caught up in a status game. People strive for status because they want to feel like their life is essential and really means something to others and the fate of the world.

    But if you look at the 8 billion people on the planet, there may not be too many people that are remembered 450 years later like Shakespeare, or over 200 years later like George Washington. This doesn’t mean that your life isn’t important to some people.

    Your life probably already means a lot to your inner circle, including your closest family, friends, and co-workers. I guess a big question then is what is more important to you? Being the person that you would like to be towards your parents, partner, children, best friends, and colleagues? Or worrying about what a random person in your town, the other side of the world, or in a few hundred years thinks about you?

    Once people have met their basic needs for shelter, water, food, and safety, the next most important things become love, connection, and esteem. Sometimes it is at this point that many of us become caught up in a status game. We feel that we need to have as many symbols of status as possible.

    We can think we want deference and flattery from others, influence and lots of money, fast cars and big houses, expensive clothing and jewellery, and lots of attention. But are any of these things really what is most important to you? If someone was writing your obituary after you died, what would you hope that they would say about the person that you have been and the people that you had the biggest positive impact on?

    We can never fully escape from the various status games, as most people naturally compare themselves to others to see how they are going. This can then impact how people feel about themselves. However, there is some wisdom in just knowing that these games are there, and we can choose which things matter or don’t matter in our lives.

    If my neighbor goes out and buys a fancy sports car or flies first class, I do not have to feel worse about myself if these games do not matter to me. The answer lies in finding and playing the games that do matter.

    It’s also not about getting to a destination, and then enjoying the rest of your life. Chances are that your mind will continue to strive for status in one way or another for the rest of your life. Therefore, there is no end or a happily ever after.

    Storr says that the key is to be happy with the direction that you are heading in and the progress that you are making. If you can live in a sustainable way with the things that really matter to you and feel connected to the people that you care most about, you will know that you are on the right track. Hopefully, your physical and mental health will be better off for it too.

    The final thing that he says, and one that I never used to understand, is that the meaning of life is about being able to keep playing in the ways that are most important to you. It is not about winning.

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • Ten Timeless Rules for a Fulfilling Life

    Ten Timeless Rules for a Fulfilling Life

    One of the better books I have read recently is Rutger Bregman’s ‘Humankind: A Hopeful History‘. It was first published by De Correspondent in the Netherlands in 2019 as ‘De Meeste Mensen Deugan‘.

    De Correspondent began as a new journalism platform in 2013 that consisted of no advertising, no cynicism, and no news. It was the idea of Dutch philosopher Rob Wijnberg, and the idea of the publication was to offer solutions. Bregman began working for De Correspondent in 2013 after a conversation with Wijnberg, and Humankind is the result of his seven years of work there.

    At the end of the book, after thoroughly highlighting that Phillip Zimbardo sucks and Gordon Allport is awesome, Bregman suggests ten rules to live by now. If we can follow these rules, it will help us to more clearly see that humans are not as bad as most people believe. Here they are:

    I: When in doubt, assume the best

    As much as ‘The Lord of the Flies’ and Phillip Zimbardo try to suggest otherwise, Bregman shows through several stories and case studies that typical human nature is fundamentally good. By presuming positive intent in others, we help foster trust and cooperation. Some Narcissists or Psychopaths will try to take advantage of you, but the majority of people will do what they can to try to co-operate with you if they know that you want to co-operate with them and want the best for them too.

    II: Think in win-win scenarios

    Sometimes people will think that to personally get ahead, or for them to win, someone else needs to lose. With certain games, like many sports (e.g. football or basketball), this is true. But there are lots of things in society that are not zero-sum games, including relationships. Bregman emphasises creating collaborative win-win solutions that help everyone, rather than zero-sum outcomes where one party’s gain is another’s loss.

    III: Ask more questions

    Curiosity and open-mindedness are key to understanding others and finding better solutions. Bregman asks us to not assume things, and instead deeply inquire what someone is saying and where they are coming from and why. People may have very different opinions about a topic, like politics, but both people or groups may share similar values below that of wanting a good life for their friends and family and people that they care most about. What if we asked more and judged less?

    IV: Temper your empathy. Train your compassion

    Empathy, or putting yourself in someone else’s shoes and really trying to feel what they are feeling, is an excellent skill to have. It can help us to feel the pain of someone struggling. By doing this, potentially we are more likely to reach out and support or act and do something about the situation. But studies have also found that experiencing empathy can be draining, which makes it a finite resource.

    People that consider themselves “empaths” report feeling a lot of empathy towards others. Over time, they learn that they need to carefully protect this resource and when they use it or risk experiencing burnout and fatigue.

    Compassion, on the other hand is a more measured approach and is not draining in the same way as empathy. It is potentially an unlimited or growing resource rather than a finite one. Different areas on the brain light up when people are experiencing compassion than empathy, and people report feeling energised by compassion rather than drained from it. By practicing compassion or loving-kindness meditation, it is possible to increase the feeling of wanting the absolute best for others, including people that you might not love or strangers, and then use the energy that comes from this into being more loving or kind through your actions.

    V: Try to understand the other, even if you don’t get where they’re coming from

    With how polarised issues seem these days, it can feel easy to write off someone else as ‘bad’ just because they think differently than you on a particular topic. But considering the echo chambers that people might be living in online, both of you may think that your position on the issue is the obvious and clearly right choice.

    What if we focused on encouraging dialogue and understanding between groups or people that are thinking differently? It could help bridge the divide between the two parties and foster better relationships.

    VI: Love others as you love your own

    One aspect of humanity that will be difficult to fully overcome is the in-group, out-group bias that nearly everyone has. Studies have found that putting different people into groups where they are working as a team towards a common goal can change how people feel towards the other people. Suddenly, the other person can change from being seen as one of them to one of us. With football, this can easily be seen. The Chelsea fan who hates the Manchester United fan might get along with them really well when England is playing in the World Cup.

    What if we could start thinking about people in a more universal way? If there was an alien invasion, would we suddenly all team up and see that we are all human and want the best for those we are closest to and care the most about? Is it possible to show that same care and respect to people all over the world?

    VII: Avoid the news

    Like the book ‘Stop Reading the News: A Manifesto for a Happier, Calmer and Wiser Life’ by Rolf Dobelli, Bregman shows that news often focuses on sensationalism and negativity. The standard news negatively distorts our perception of ourselves, others, the state of the world, and our future. By stepping back from constant news consumption, we can keep a more balanced view of humanity and see how much progress we have already made and how much we are likely to make going into the future too.

    When I tell some people that I try to consume as little traditional news as possible, it seems like some people think I am not trying to stay informed on the important things that are going on around the world. That is not necessarily true, I’m just not sure if the standard news really is the place to get it. I subscribe to both the Fix the News and Human Progress weekly newsletters. They summarise a lot of positive events that are happening around the world, and I love reading about all of the amazing progress and innovation that is occurring.

    For example, the new Malaria vaccines that are being rolled out across Africa look pretty amazing, and could prevent cases by 30% with one vaccine and have 75% efficacy over a year with another. That could go a long way in reducing the overall cases we get each year (estimated 249 million cases in 2022), and hopefully reducing the overall death toll too (estimated 608,000 in 2022).

    VIII: Don’t punch Nazis

    By just looking at the wording, it seems like the most irrelevant rule of the list. Especially seeing that I don’t tend to meet too many people who identify as Nazis. But if we interpret this rule a little bit wider, we can see that Bregman is advocating for non-violence and the importance of addressing hate through understanding and dialogue rather than through aggression.

    Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jnr are two of the most famous examples of what progress can be achieved through nonviolent resistance. Nelson Mandela is another great example of what can be achieved through trying to move forward in the most effective way rather than trying to punish people for what they have done in the past.

    IX: Come out of the closet, and don’t be ashamed to do good

    Embrace and be proud of your positive actions and values, even if they are unconventional or are met with resistance or judgment by others. The VIA character strengths survey or the intrinsic values test are two great ways to get clearer on what your key strengths and core values are. Once you are aware of these, you can then look at how they can be applied more in your day-to-day life going forward.

    This doesn’t mean that you need to tell everyone about what you are doing necessarily, and it definitely doesn’t mean taking photos or videos of the people that you are trying to help out. But it’s also okay to show others through your actions that acts of care and kindness can be done, and it can contribute to you feeling better and the world being better over time too.

    X: Be realistic

    Finally, Bregman suggests maintaining a practical outlook while being hopeful. Human behaviour is complex, and not everything is amazing. Just because progress has occurred, it doesn’t mean that there isn’t a lot of negative things out there that are occurring too. Most recently, the cost of living challenges are having a huge impact on the mental and physical health of lots of people in Melbourne, Australia, and I am sure that it is probably happening in many other places too.

    There is always going to be trauma out there in the world, unlucky events, and certain people doing selfish and horrible things. However, if you can see that even though you might have some challenges, generally you try to be fair and kind, then potentially there are more people out there that are trying to be like this too.

    Like Bregman, I’d prefer to have an optimistic view towards others and the world. If we can try to live by these rules, it could help us to foster a more compassionate and constructive approach to interacting with others and viewing the world.

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • Mapping Your Life’s Journey: Is it a Western, Eastern, Southern, or Northern Story?

    Mapping Your Life’s Journey: Is it a Western, Eastern, Southern, or Northern Story?

    In the grand narrative of our lives, we often depict ourselves as the central character, or hero of our story. This makes a lot of sense. We are much more aware of our thoughts, feelings, dreams, intentions and actions than we are of others. Most movies that we watch or stories that we read also give the most attention to the hero.

    A hero is someone who is living an epic tale, having to navigate through various landscapes and challenges. But have you ever considered what type of story or narrative you are playing out?

    Is it a tragedy? Where things started out promisingly, but then everything slowly gets worse until you lose everything and die alone? Or is it a redemptive story? Things haven’t always been easy but you turn things around. You figure out how to live the life you have always wanted.

    Let’s delve into the idea of life’s journey through the lens of Western, Eastern, Southern, and Northern storytelling archetypes. Each direction offers a unique perspective on how we perceive our experiences and aspirations.

    The Western Story: Quest and Conquest

    Western stories are essentially about a quest or a journey toward a goal. Heroes venture into unknown territories. The protagonist is often driven by ambition. They seek personal growth or pursue a dream. They face daunting challenges and ultimately return transformed.

    Consider the film “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” (1966) or the book “Riders of the Purple Sage” by Zane Grey. In each story, it focuses on a gunslinger. In the film, the hero is competing to find buried treasure. In the book, the hero is fighting against oppressive forces.

    If you see your life as a Western story, you view yourself as a trailblazer. You are tackling obstacles and striving toward personal achievements. Your journey is marked by significant milestones, dramatic confrontations, and a sense of progression. The satisfaction comes from overcoming adversity and reaching new heights, much like the heroes who triumph in the end.

    In a Western narrative, the police take bold actions to tackle crime. The legal system is adversarial and pursues both personal and societal justice and seeks victory. Officers confront danger and wrongdoing with determination and bravery. The emphasis is on personal freedoms and the right to a fair trial.

    The Eastern Story: Harmony and Balance

    The emphasis in Eastern stories is on balance, inner peace, and harmony with the universe. These stories are deeply rooted in Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism philosophies. The focus is on understanding one’s place in the world. It also involves finding equilibrium and achieving a state of enlightenment.

    Think of the movies “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” (2000) or “Spirited Away” (2001). The first film has themes of honour, balance and inner peace. The second identity, growth and harmony.

    If you see your life as resembling an Eastern narrative, you care about maintaining balance. You value inner peace more than chasing external goals. Your journey will involve self-discovery, spiritual growth, and fostering connections with others. The ultimate aim is not necessarily about achieving greatness but about finding harmony and living according to your values.

    In an Eastern story, the police and the courts work to prevent conflict. They resolve disputes in ways that preserve societal equilibrium. There is a focus on mediation and reconciliation, rather than winning or punishing offenders. The emphasis is on moral conduct and social harmony. It integrates modern legal principles and structures with traditional wisdom and informal community practices.

    The Southern Story: Community and Connection

    Southern stories highlight themes of community, tradition, and connection to the land. These narratives are rich with cultural heritage and emphasize the importance of relationships, family, and communal ties. Southern stories showcase the strength found in family or community bonds. They respect traditions passed down through generations.

    Two famous examples of a Southern narrative is the movie “Steel Magnolias” (1989) or the book “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee. In the movie, a close-knit group of Southern Women support each other through life’s ups and downs. In the book, it explores themes of racial injustice, community and moral growth.

    If you view your life through a Southern lens, you emphasize nurturing relationships. You also focus on contributing to your community. Your journey involves staying connected to your roots, supporting others, and finding fulfillment in shared experiences. The narrative here is less about you as an individual. It is more about the impact you have on those around you.

    In a Southern narrative, the police are part of the community. They will work closely with residents to help resolve issues and build relationships. Justice is restorative in nature, and focuses on repairing harm and reintegrating offenders into society. The legal system will try to uphold community norms and customs. It can be influenced by local leaders, community elders and informal networks of support.

    The Northern Story: Exploration and Self-Reliance

    Northern stories are characterized by exploration, resilience, and self-reliance. They involve journeys into harsh or uncharted territories where survival and self-sufficiency are key. These narratives celebrate strength, endurance, and the capacity to thrive in challenging conditions.

    Think of the film “The Revenant” (2015), or the movie and book “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer. Both involve people venturing solo into the harsh wilderness. To seek vengeance in “The Revenant”, and to seek meaning and self-reliance in “Into the Wild”.

    If you view your life narrative as a Northern, you see yourself as a pioneer facing and overcoming personal trials. You venture into new experiences, embrace challenges head-on, and show resilience in the face of adversity. You focus on personal fortitude and the ability to navigate through difficult circumstances with determination and courage.

    In a Northern story, the police are cold and unforgiving. Their emphasis will be on personal responsibility and self-reliance. The legal system will incorporate elements of survival-based justice. It will be both adaptable and resourceful, as conventional approaches are often not possible in isolated areas.

    Reflecting on Your Narrative

    Understanding which direction your life story aligns with can give you valuable insights into your motivations, values, and aspirations. Your journey could integrate elements from all four directions. It does not have to be just one. Your life can gain from having a rich and complex narrative.

    It is possible to pursue goals with a Western sense of adventure while seeking inner peace with an Eastern approach. You can stay connected to your community like in a Southern story, and embrace challenges with Northern resilience.

    Ultimately, recognizing your narrative can help you understand your life and journey better. It helps you make conscious choices about how you want to shape your future.

    You might be drawn to the quest for greatness. Maybe you are pursuing balance or enjoying the warmth of community. Perhaps you are exploring new horizons. No matter what, your life’s story is uniquely yours. Reflect on your own journey. Embrace the narratives that resonate most with you. Let them guide you toward a fulfilling and meaningful existence.

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • Life Satisfaction vs. Daily Joy: A Global Perspective

    Life Satisfaction vs. Daily Joy: A Global Perspective

    I was recently reading through The 2024 Gallup Global Emotions report. I was really interested to see how different the findings were in comparison to the World Happiness Report findings.

    In the World Happiness report, the top ten countries in terms of life satisfaction are:

    1. Finland
    2. Denmark
    3. Iceland
    4. Sweden
    5. Israel
    6. Netherlands
    7. Norway
    8. Luxembourg
    9. Switzerland
    10. Australia

    For the Gallup Global Emotions report, the top ten countries in terms of positive experiences from the day before in 2023 looked very different:

    1. Paraguay = 86
    2. Panama = 86
    3. Guatemala = 85
    4. Mexico = 84
    5. Indonesia = 84
    6. El Salvador = 83
    7. Costa Rica = 83
    8. Malaysia = 82
    9. Senegal = 82
    10. Philippines = 82

    In fact, there is no overlap at all between the two top ten lists. The World Happiness report top ten is dominated by Nordic and European countries. Israel and Australia are the only exceptions. The Gallup Global positive experiences top ten is instead made up of countries from Central and South America and Asia. Senegal is the only exception.

    So what is going on here, and why is there such a big difference with no overlap in either top ten list?

    I think it because they are measuring different things. Previously, I have written an article about our two selves. The first is the experiential self, or how much we are enjoying things in the moment. The second is the narrative self, or how we are feeling about our life in general.

    The Cantril Ladder question that determines the World Happiness rankings asks more about people’s narrative self. It questions people’s life satisfaction in general on a scale from 0 to 10. A score of 0 is the worst life they can imagine. Meanwhile, 10 signifies the best life.

    The Gallup Positive Experiences instead asks about people’s experiential self. It asks how well-rested someone felt yesterday. It also asks if they were treated with respect all day. Furthermore, it inquires if they smiled or laughed a lot. It then asks if they did something interesting or learned something, and if they felt enjoyment.

    In determining where it would be better to live, you may need to consider your priorities. Ask yourself which self is more important to you. Would you rather feel more satisfied with your life in general. Or would you rather experience more positive things from day to day?

    Maybe both things are important to you. However, it could be tough to find a country excelling in looking after both our narrative and experiential self. I think I might actually prefer to live in a country with more positive experiences. What about you?

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • Which Activities Make Us the Happiest?

    Which Activities Make Us the Happiest?

    The app Mappiness pings people twice a day and asks them what they have just been doing, who they are with, and where they are. It can also tell what the temperature and weather are. It then asks people three questions:

    1. How happy are you?
    2. How relaxed are you?
    3. How awake do you feel?

    People can answer anywhere on a scale from “not at all” at one end to “extremely” at the other end.

    Photo by veeterzy on Pexels.com

    Can the weather impact people’s happiness?

    Mappiness has looked at the data from 15,444 people across 138,407 observations. Warmer temperatures tend to help the average person feel happier than colder temperatures (+4). However, rain negatively impacts people’s moods more than cold weather (-11). If it is sunny, it makes a slight positive difference to how people feel, but not too much (+1.1).

    Photo by energepic.com on Pexels.com

    The average person doesn’t enjoy working or studying

    Working and studying tend to make people less happy while they are doing it (-5.43). It doesn’t mean that we should all go out and quit our job tomorrow. Most people need the money and are likely to be more satisfied in their overall lives with a job than if they are unemployed. However, while at work, the average person would rather be doing pretty much anything else. Out of the 39 activities, only being sick in bed was rated less enjoyable. Friday is the happiest day of the workweek because people look forward to not having to work on the weekend. Saturday and Sunday have the highest happiness ratings throughout the week and are pretty similar to each other.

    Photo by Afta Putta Gunawan on Pexels.com

    Socializing more can make you happier, as long as it’s not with your boss

    Spending time with close friends makes us the happiest (+8.19). Followed by time with a spouse or partner (+5.91). Then other family members (+2.94). Time with children produces slightly more happiness than being alone (+1.4), but higher than time with clients, customers (+0.72), colleagues, classmates (+0.64), and other people the participant knows (+0.66). Notice how these social interactions produce more happiness for the average person than being alone. Being with one’s boss is the only social interaction rated less pleasantly than being alone (Kahneman et al., 2004).

    Which activities do people do the most?

    Regarding the type of activities, the most frequently reported activities were working or studying (27.4%), watching TV or a film (17.8%), talking, chatting, socializing (14.2%), sleeping, resting, relaxing (9.6%), eating, snacking (9.5%), travelling, commuting (9.1%), listening to music (6%), drinking tea/coffee (5.4%), drinking alcohol (5.2%), or housework, chores, DIY (4.9%).

    Photo by Helena Lopes on Pexels.com

    Which activities increase your happiness?

    The activity that tends to make us feel the happiest at the moment isn’t too much of a surprise, with intimacy or making love the highest rated by a long way (+14.2). Going to the theatre, a dance, or a concert is the second highest (+9.29), followed closely by an exhibition, museum, or library (+8.77).

    Physical activities or being in nature all seem to score high, with sports, running, exercise (+8.12) the fourth highest, and then gardening (+7.83). Birdwatching or nature watching (+6.28), walking or hiking (+6.18), and hunting or fishing (+5.82) all continue this trend. The activities rated higher are singing, performing (+6.95), and talking, chatting, and socializing (+6.38), especially with close friends and partners.

    Typically overrated activities include more passive ones, including watching TV or a film (+2.55), drinking tea/coffee (+1.83), reading (+1.47), listening to a speech or a podcast (+1.41), sleeping, resting or relaxing (+1.08), browsing the internet (+0.59), texting, email or social media (+0.56).

    Photo by Eric Prouzet on Pexels.com

    Which activities reduce your happiness?

    Activities that tend to reduce happiness levels include housework, chores, DIY (-0.65), commuting (-1.47), or being in a meeting or class (-1.5). Worse still is doing admin or organizing or doing finances (-2.45), waiting, queueing (-3.51), caring or helping adults (-4.3), working or studying (-5.43), and being sick in bed (-20.4).

    You can’t avoid all of these activities. Still, knowing how negative they typically are can be helpful. For example, choosing a place to live closer to work where you can walk or ride rather than commute could make a positive difference in your mood. As could paying for someone to clean your house or iron your clothes if you don’t enjoy doing this.

    I don’t enjoy unnecessary meetings, so minimising these as much as possible could help. Likewise, I could try to find a job with more of the work I enjoy and less of the stuff I do not. I could try not to work too many hours each week. Finally, I could try to look after my health as much as possible so that I am not in bed sick too often.

    I want to thank Seth Stephens-Davidowitz for sharing these interesting insights alongside many others in his latest book, ‘Don’t Trust Your Gut’. If you’d like to see how Big Data can help you to understand yourself or people better, I’d recommend checking out this book as well as his first one ‘Everybody Lies’.

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • Breaking Free from Fate: Fresh Approaches to Lasting Behavioural Change

    Breaking Free from Fate: Fresh Approaches to Lasting Behavioural Change

    I read an interesting book recently called ‘Determined: Life Without Free Will’ by Robert Sapolsky.

    In it, he takes the firm stance of hard incompatibilism. Sapolsky says that the world is deterministic, which means that there is no free will. He even goes so far as to say that we are not morally responsible for our actions. Therefore, we should not be punished for them legally.

    Sapolsky says that all of our behaviours are directly generated by our biological past. Even if it feels like we have some choice in what we do, we actually do not. Our neurons fire in a certain way before we become aware of wanting to respond in a certain way. It might feel like you have decided to act in a certain way. You might feel like you choose one action over another. However, your biology and past experiences have already determined how you are going to respond in whatever situation you are in.

    So, even if you feel like you have decided to have that second piece of chocolate cake for dessert. You might think it is a choice as opposed to that piece of watermelon. However, it was never really a choice at all. Due to your past and your preferences, your mind will make that same choice in that same situation no matter what you do.

    To me, living in a world without any free will doesn’t sound that great. It also goes against what it feels like to live my life. I don’t want to just resign myself to act however I might be most tempted. I want to try to improve myself. I want to become a better person over time.

    If there really is no free will, is there even a point to self-help, self-improvement and psychological therapy? I still think there is. However, we need to focus more on things that can make a real difference in our lives. We cannot just hope to have more willpower to make the right decisions for ourselves at the right times.

    ACT, or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, focuses on accepting things as they are. This approach helps prevent people from getting caught up in the struggle of trying to change something. Without free will, maybe acceptance and self-compassion are better than trying to change things you don’t like about yourself.

    Does this mean change isn’t possible?

    Not the way I see it. Even ACT sees the importance of clarifying what is most important to you and taking action towards these things.

    Even if we have less free will than we imagine, I still think that change is possible in several ways. We can control to some degree what information we choose to take in. We can spend more time with people who are living their lives in ways that we would like to. We can spend less time with people that are draining to us. We can change the environment that we live in. Finally, we can focus on establishing healthy habits and sustainable systems. Let’s explore each of these in more detail:

    1. The information that you take in

    I try to focus on three main areas of information:

    • The news I consume. I try to minimise how much news I watch on TV, online and in the newspapers. If I do read the news, I really like the weekly newsletters from HumanProgress.org and Fix the News.
    • Social media. I still use WhatsApp and Messenger to chat with friends. However, I have deactivated and no longer have access to Instagram or Facebook. I don’t know my passwords either, so can not log back in even if I wanted to. I still have access to X and LinkedIn on my computer, but rarely check them and don’t engage with others through them.
    • My phone. I have switched my iPhone to greyscale. I turn this off if I video chat with someone. When it is on, I am much less likely to use the phone more than I want to. I do not have any games on there except for Duolingo or Elevate. I enjoy listening to audiobooks, podcasts or music while walking or at the gym. I try to minimise all other uses apart from directly communicating with friends.

    Are you happy with the information that you are taking in each day or week? Does it positively or negatively impact how you feel about yourself, others, the world or the future? Is there any type of information that you would like to see more of or less of?

    2. The people that you spend the most time with, and how you spend time with them

    A quote most often attributed to motivational speaker Jim Rohn says

    “you’re the average of the five people that you spend the most time with”

    Who are the five people that you are closest with in your life? What influence do you think that they have on you?

    Now, I am not suggesting that you should stop speaking to your family members or partner. They might sometimes be more critical or negative than you would like them to be. However, is there any way that some of these relationships can be improved? Through better communication? More quality time? A fun holiday? Getting back into some interesting activities or rituals that you used to enjoy? Or trying some things that you have always wanted to do together?

    If not, are there some people in your life that you don’t see as often as you would like to? Could any of these people have a positive influence on you?

    3. Better environmental design

    At the end of May 2024, I moved into my new apartment. It is a 10-minute walk from work, which brings with it lots of potential benefits. I can spend less time commuting, which frees up more time for doing more enjoyable things that I would like to do in my life.

    Additionally, it also has a great gym in the apartment complex, an indoor swimming pool, and some reformer Pilates beds. I have been working out more, and feeling healthier, fitter and stronger as a result. Since moving, I have also joined two sports teams for the first time since 2020. In general, I feel like my environment is helping me to live more of the life I want to live.

    I no longer have alcohol or any drinks with added sugar in them at my apartment. It means that if I am thirsty, I can have soda water or water. I have also cut out having deep-fried foods, chips, cakes or chocolate at home. By removing these things from my home, I am less prone to turn to them when I am bored or hungry. If I really want these things, I can still have them when out socialising, and at least get the benefits of social connection.

    Thinking about your own environment, are there certain things at the moment that you are spending more time doing than you would like to be? Are there things that you would like to replace it with instead?

    4. Healthy habits or sustainable systems

    The things that I know are positive or good for me include:

    • Being socially connected and catching up with friends in person at least once a week. This also means staying in touch with my family and those who are important to me. Ideally, this would also include spending some time with people with whom we share similar interests or hobbies and can do these things together.
    • Seeing clients face to face. By working so close to home, I hope to be able to keep my working time to when I am in my office and give all of my clients the option to come in and see me face-to-face if they would like to do this. Online sessions can be really convenient for people who live too far away or want therapy without it taking as much time out of their day. However, some studies suggest that we don’t get as many of the positive social benefits by talking to people online or over the phone as we do with connecting in person.
    • I now have a good morning routine since the start of 2024 of doing Duolingo, Elevate, meditation on Waking Up, and journalling on Stoic.
    • I try to maintain some healthy habits of going to the gym, swimming at the pool and doing Pilates regularly, and walking 7,500 steps every day. As I live in a city environment, if I can do some of this walking in nature, such as at the Royal Botanical Gardens or around Albert Park Lake, that is even better.
    • Having enough novelty and adventure in my life, including some healthy competition through sport again. I also want to try to see if I can plan some holidays again for the future, and book these enough in advance so that I get the benefits of planning for them, looking forward to them, and being able to enjoy going on them.
    • Not working too much, and making sure that I am being as efficient as possible with my administrative tasks and processes at work so that I can enjoy my time when I am at home and with others. Hopefully, this can also leave enough time for downtime and relaxation, reading books I enjoy, watching movies or TV shows or documentaries I like, and learning or being creative in the ways I would like to be.

    What healthy habits or systems would you most like to incorporate in your life if possible? Are there any pain points now where you put off doing certain tasks that you know that you have to do? Could there be a better way to think about it less and get it done more easily?

    Conclusion

    According to Robert Sapolsky, because we don’t have any free will, we are not to blame for the things that happen in our lives. We are not to blame for our genetics, or what has happened in our past. Everything that we have done makes sense given our genetics, experiences and environment. Therefore, the more that we can accept ourselves, and the more self-compassion we can have towards ourselves, the better.

    However, we can nudge our behaviours in the right way moving forward through healthy nutrition, positive social support, healthy sleep, regular exercise, positive information, necessary medication and setting up our environment, habits and systems in healthy ways.

    If we really don’t have as much free will (and willpower), as it sometimes seems, the other levers that we can pull to change our behaviours become even more important. Try to not beat yourself up for what has happened in your past. Instead, focus on changing the external things in your life going forward that can help contribute to your positive long-term success.

  • Why 18 is the New 15: The Negative Consequences of Always Wanting Our Children to Feel Special and Safe

    Why 18 is the New 15: The Negative Consequences of Always Wanting Our Children to Feel Special and Safe

    In 1970, children were “ready” to enter Grade One at Primary or Elementary School if they travelled independently around their neighbourhood (four to eight blocks from their house).

    Six-year-olds could go to the shops and buy things by themselves or walk or ride to school if close enough. Children also knew how to explain to a police officer where they lived if asked.

    These days, the police officer would probably arrest the parents for neglect if a six-year-old child was found four blocks from home by themselves.

    Times have changed, but is this always a good thing for our children?

    I remember having a lot of freedom growing up. My mother would let me and my siblings play down at the park by ourselves two blocks away from our house. My brother was 7 or 8, I was 5, and my sister was 2 or 3. We weren’t entirely alone. According to my mother, we had a pet Rottweiler watch over us too, and “she would never have let anyone hurt you kids!”.

    We rode or walked ourselves to and from school when my brother was in grade 5, I was in grade 3, and my sister was in grade 1. It wasn’t just a bike path either. We had to ride on roads, cross over a river and railway tracks, and not even at a designated crossing. My parents had to work, so we travelled by ourselves.

    After school, we’d come home, open the door, make a snack, and play some games or watch TV until our parents came back from work. We were “latch key kids”, and I don’t think we minded too much at all.

    Growing up, we played outside unsupervised by adults all the time. We were running around with the other kids on the street, playing a sport or making up games, having water bomb fights during the day or playing spotlight at night. We’d ride to the milkbar whenever we felt like ice cream or a snack and even did a paper round in the neighbourhood with my brother a few times well before we were old enough to work legally.

    There were a few scraped knees, and maybe some storm drains that we shouldn’t have gone down. But I knew how to bike ride all over town to my friend’s places by my 10th birthday. Exploring places with my friends and without any parents were some of the best memories of my childhood.

    Fast forward to 2024, and most children will have to wait until they leave their family home to get the same amount of unsupervised time outside that I had before I was a teenager. They spend less time hanging out with their friends in person, and any time they spend is likely to be supervised by their parents or done alongside them, even when they go to the local shopping mall.

    In her excellent book, ‘iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids are Growing up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy — and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood’, the author Jean Twenge says that as a result of the reduced freedom for our youth, the typical 18-year-old in 2022 is similar in maturity levels to what a 15-year-old was back in 1970.

    These days, children and adolescents are less capable of living, socialising, or working independently than the previous generations and are suffering more psychologically.

    Depression, anxiety, narcissism and deliberate self-harm have all been increasing, and dramatically so since 2012. Unfortunately, this also coincides with the widespread proliferation of smartphones into our society.

    Parents should give their children more freedom in the real world while also being more concerned about the safety of their children online. Adolescent girls appear to be particularly impacted by the introduction of the smartphone and the increased usage of social media that comes with this. As a result, suicide rates among teenage girls have risen to the point where they are now similar to suicide rates in boys of the same age.

    What would you prefer to build in a child?

    A. A conviction that they are amazing, just the way they are?

    or

    B. A belief that they can face and overcome most of the challenges they face in life if they learn from setbacks and feedback and apply themselves?

    You may answer both, but what would it be if you had to choose one?

    Self-esteem (A), defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as:

    “a confidence and satisfaction in oneself”

    or

    Self-efficacy (B), which Psychologist Albert Bandura defined as:

    “the belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the sources of action required to manage prospective situations.”

    After decades of research, we now know that focusing on building a child’s sense of self-worth and self-esteem (A) at the expense of improving their capacity and self-efficacy (B) in learning and doing things by themselves can have some adverse side effects.

    Research on Self-Esteem:

    LOW SELF-ESTEEM IS NOT GREAT

    • Low self-esteem correlates with increased violence, teenage pregnancy, suicide, low academic achievement and increased rates of school dropout (Misetich & Delis-Abrams, 2003)
    • Living alone, being unemployed, having low socioeconomic status or having a disability is linked to lower self-esteem (von Soest, Wagner, Hansen & Gerstorf, 2018)
    • 70% of girls believe that they are not good enough or don’t measure up in some way (Dove Self-Esteem Fund, 2008)
    • Teenagers with low self-esteem have less resilience and a greater sense of hopelessness (Karatas, 2011)

    HEALTHY LEVELS OF SELF-ESTEEM IS BENEFICIAL

    • People with healthy self-esteem are more resilient and able to respond helpfully and adaptively to disappointment, failure and obstacles (Allegiance Health, 2015)
    • In China, self-esteem significantly predicted life satisfaction (Chen, Cheung, Bond & Leung, 2006)
    • School programs that build self-esteem in primary school children also reduce problem behaviours and strengthen connections between the students (Park & Park, 2014)

    HIGH SELF-ESTEEM ISN’T ALWAYS A POSITIVE

    • Abraham Maslow put self-esteem as a need in his hierarchy of needs pyramid. However, he later noted that individuals with high self-esteem are more apt to come late to appointments, be less respectful, more casual, more condescending, and much more willing to make themselves comfortable without bidding or invitation.
    • Carl Rogers, another Humanistic Psychologist, got so sick of new staff coming into his Western Behavioural Sciences Institute with no desire or ability to work that he once sent out a letter that said, “less self-esteem please; more self-discipline!”
    • People with fragile or shallow high self-esteem are no better off than individuals with low self-esteem. They engage in exaggerated tendencies to protect, defend and enhance their feelings of self-worth (Kernis, 2008)
    • Academic performance is weakly related to self-esteem, with some students doing worse academically after their self-esteem increased (Baumeister, Campbell, Krueger & Vohs, 2005)

    Baumeister has looked extensively into the issues with some types of high self-esteem. He found that:

    • Students with high self-esteem tend to overestimate their abilities. They also like to boast to others about what they can do.
    • High self-esteem doesn’t make people more attractive to others; it just makes the individual think they are more attractive
    • Bullies at school and work tend to have higher reported levels of self-esteem
    • People with high self-esteem are more likely to take risks and engage in unprotected sex. They tend to be impulsive and not think through the consequences of a decision before acting
    • People with high self-esteem are more likely to be prejudiced against others. They tend to be smug and superior when interacting with others
    • People with high self-esteem are less likely to work through and overcome relationship conflicts. They can be abusive in relationships and assume their needs come first no matter what situation they are in
    • People with high self-esteem seem blind to their faults and are less likely to learn from experience, change or improve themselves

    Research on Self-Efficacy:

    SELF-EFFICACY HELPS PEOPLE AT WORK

    • A meta-analysis of over 100 studies found a moderately strong correlation (.38) between self-efficacy and job performance (Stakjovic & Luthans, 1998)
    • Another meta-analysis found that high self-efficacy is related to better emotional stability and greater job satisfaction (Judge & Bono, 2001)
    • Greater self-efficacy leads to less burnout for teachers (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2007)
    • Increased self-efficacy in nurses can improve their work performance, reduce turnover rates and protect them from exhaustion (Fida, Laschinger & Leiter, 2018)

    SELF-EFFICACY HELPS STUDENTS AT SCHOOL

    • High optimism and self-efficacy in students lead to better academic performance, greater coping with stress, better health, and more satisfaction with school (Chemers, Ju & Garcia, 2001)
    • Increased self-efficacy leads to more enthusiasm and commitment to learning in students who had previously been struggling to read (Margolis & McCabe, 2006)

    SELF-EFFICACY CAN IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES

    • Patients with cancer with high self-efficacy adjust to their diagnosis better and are more likely to adhere to their recommended treatment (Lev, 1997)
    • Patients with high self-efficacy who have joint replacement surgery exercise more frequently and improve their performance more after the surgery (Moon & Backer, 2000)
    • Improving self-efficacy can increase how much previously sedentary adults exercise, which then enhances their overall health (McAuley, 1992)
    • Parental self-efficacy can reduce the risk of postpartum depression in new mothers (Cutrona & Troutman, 1986)
    • Low self-efficacy is related to anxiety (including social anxiety and panic attacks) and depressive symptoms (Muris, 2002)

    What Can We Do?

    I’d rather have my children go to a school where teachers are more like Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. Here’s an excerpt from his excellent commencement address to his son’s year nine graduating class in 2017:

    From time to time in the years to come, I hope you will be treated unfairly, so that you will come to know the value of justice. I hope that you will suffer betrayal because that will teach you the importance of loyalty. Sorry to say, but I hope you will be lonely from time to time so that you don’t take friends for granted. I wish you bad luck, again, from time to time so that you will be conscious of the role of chance in life and understand that your success is not completely deserved and that the failure of others is not completely deserved either. And when you lose, as you will from time to time, I hope every now and then, your opponent will gloat over your failure. It is a way for you to understand the importance of sportsmanship. I hope you’ll be ignored so you know the importance of listening to others, and I hope you will have just enough pain to learn compassion. Whether I wish these things or not, they’re going to happen. And whether you benefit from them or not will depend upon your ability to see the message in your misfortunes.

    Chief Justice John Roberts

    I want our kids to learn life lessons that help them gain the skills and knowledge required to function as independent adults in the world.

    I want children to be physically and mentally healthy and suffer less from emotional and psychological disorders.

    I want them to develop high self-efficacy and a belief that they can do something by trial-and-error and effort rather than assuming that they are great no matter what they can do.

    How Do We Build Self-Efficacy?

    According to Bandura and Akhtar (2008), there are four main ways to build self-efficacy in our children’s lives:

    1. Mastery experiences: Ensure that your child has regular opportunities to take on and tackle new and challenging tasks that are just outside their current level of comfort and competence. By pushing themselves with these tasks, they will gain more self-efficacy than repeating something they already know how to do.
    2. Vicarious experiences: Ensure that your children have positive role models or mentors that they can observe doing the things you want them to know how to do. It could be you, another family member, a friend of yours or a coach. Because you are likely to spend more time with them than other people, it is essential to model the behaviours, mindset and skills you want them to learn. If you do this, they can learn from you, emulate what you do, and then get feedback on how they are going and keep improving these skills.
    3. Verbal persuasion: The type of words used in self-talk and with others can significantly affect how much self-efficacy one feels. Like Dr Carol Dweck says, in promoting a growth mindset rather than a fixed mindset, we need to praise effort and what children do (their actions and intentions) rather than who they are as a person or what the outcome was. It builds up a greater desire to take on more challenging tasks in the future instead of the fear of being wrong, not succeeding, or not being “smart enough”.
    4. Emotional and physiological states: We need to focus on children’s overall mental and physical health and well-being. If they are sick, tired, sleepy, hungry, stressed, depressed or anxious, it will be more challenging for them to maintain a high level of self-efficacy, and belief in their ability to successfully tackle a challenge will decrease. By helping children look after the other areas of their health, they are more likely to have the energy and confidence to take on whatever is in front of them, overcome setbacks, and persist until they have achieved their goals.

    For more information and ideas on how to help kids to build resilience and self-efficacy, please visit the Let Grow website or learn more about the Free Range Kids’ Movement.

    Crime rates are now at their lowest point since 1963. Thanks to many societal changes, your children are physically safer growing up, yet they have way less freedom. Would you be willing to supervise your children a bit less and let them do more in the real world by themselves or with their friends if it helped them grow into independent, resilient and capable adults?

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • To Trust or Not to Trust?

    To Trust or Not to Trust?

    Recently, some things have come to light that I find disappointing. A person has behaved in a self-centred way, and it puts me in an awkward situation.

    I always try to be kind, open, honest, respectful, and cooperative if given a choice. However, sometimes some people don’t play by these same rules, and the more direct you are, the more they can use this information against you.

    These experiences have led to me doubting myself. Some friends tell me that I am too trusting. Other friends tell me that the only way to respond is by playing the game and putting my own needs first.

    What should we do if someone is being unkind and only considering their needs irrespective of the consequences these actions have on us?

    Game Theory

    Game theory looks for the best rational approach in a strategic interaction between two people or groups of people. There are many different games, including cooperative games, where an official can enforce the rules and consequences, and zero-sum games, where one person’s gain is another person’s loss.

    One of the most famous examples of a game is the ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’:

    Imagine that you are a criminal gang member and arrested alongside one of your gang associates. You are in separate rooms at the police station, and you have no way of communicating with your associate. Finally, after some time, the Police tell you that they have insufficient evidence to get either of you on a hefty charge, but enough to get both of you on a minor offence. So the Police give you and the other prisoner one of two options:

    1. You can betray your associate by testifying that they were the one who committed the crime, or
    2. You can cooperate with your associate by remaining silent and refusing to testify.

    The possible outcomes are:

    A. If you both remain silent and cooperate with each other against the Police, you both only get one year in prison.

    B. If you both try to betray each other by agreeing to testify, you both get two years in prison.

    C. If they betray you, but you’ve tried to cooperate, they get to walk free, and you get three years in prison.

    D. If they try to cooperate by remaining silent, but you betray them and agree to testify, you get to walk free while they have to go to prison for three years.

    The best rational approach is not to cooperate with your associate, because at worst, you will get two years in prison (B), and at best, you will serve no time (D). Compare this to the worst outcome of three years in jail (C) if you remain silent, and the best result is one year in prison (A). Therefore, not betraying your associate and cooperating will only lead to a worse outcome, even if you know that your associate will cooperate with 100% certainty.

    Consequently, it is not always rational to try to cooperate with someone who could potentially take advantage of you. Furthermore, it is not sound to try to cooperate with someone trying to take advantage of you.

    What About Long-term Strategies?

    Suppose two people play multiple games of Prisoner’s Dilemma and remember what the other player did previously. Does it make it more desirable to cooperate rather than betray the other person? Similar to how most relationships are in real life, crossing your associates may not be wise if you have to keep dealing with them or the rest of the gang.

    We may win more in one situation, but at what cost? This iterated version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma is sometimes known as the ‘Peace-War game’.

    In 1984, Robert Axelrod organised a tournament where participants chose their strategies in an extended version of the Peace-War game, with 2000 trials. He found that greedy approaches to the game didn’t fare too well and resulted in more years spent in prison by the end of the game.

    One of the most straightforward strategies was also the most effective — tit-for-tat. The tit-for-tat strategy aims to always cooperate in the first trial and then do what your opponent did on the previous trial for your next move. This way, you punish a betrayal with a quick betrayal back and reward cooperation with ongoing cooperation. Sometimes (in 1–5% of the trials), it is good to cooperate once even after your opponent betrays you, but generally, the most effective method is still tit-for-tat, which is interesting to know.

    After the tournament ended, Axelrod studied the data and identified four main conditions for a successful strategy when negotiating with other people:

    1. We must be nice. We should never defect or cheat before the other person does, even if we only want the best for ourselves.
    2. We must retaliate quickly and at least 95% of the time if people try to defect against or cheat us. It’s not good to be a blind optimist or always cooperate no matter what the other person does. It only leads to us being taken advantage of by greedy people.
    3. We must be forgiving and get back to trying to cooperate once we see that the other person is trying to cooperate again.
    4. We must not be envious and try to beat our opponent or score more than them. Creating a win-win scenario is ideal if possible, even if it means giving up some points by cooperating when you could defect.

    What Relevance Does This Have For Real Life?

    It may be easy to fall into the trap of thinking that screwing others over is the best way to get ahead in life. Or to not put ourselves out there so that others don’t take advantage of us. In reality, this would only be the best approach in a world where every other person tries to take advantage of everyone else every chance they can. It is not the case in any society on our planet, as far as I know. So never trusting people and always assuming the worst from others is not the way to go.

    By looking at the table above, the best outcome is to try and trust reliable individuals (and co-operate with them) and not rely on or co-operate with individuals who are not. The worst results are being hurt by putting our trust in those we shouldn’t or not letting in or co-operating with others that we really could have.

    Maybe I am a little too trusting. I assume that other people are kind and good people who have good intentions unless I am proven otherwise. It is the position that I will continue to take, even if it means that sometimes I get hurt once I realise that someone is a bit more self-centred or dishonest than I had hoped.

    Looking at the four elements of a successful negotiating strategy, I know that I am nice, forgiving and non-envious. However, the lesson that I need to learn is that of swift and appropriate retaliation or enforcing a particular consequence shortly after someone is nasty towards me. It would help deter the other person from trying any more selfish tactics in the future and could put them back on the path towards co-operating and trying to achieve a win-win situation for both of us.

    I have previously thought that if I always co-operate, I can be happy with the person I am. However, sometimes being firm and assertive and standing up for myself in the face of unkind and selfish behaviour is the far better and more self-respecting approach to take.

    I hope this article has encouraged you to not give up on trying to trust or cooperate with others. I also hope it will enable you to stand up for yourself if someone tries to take advantage of you.

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist

  • Where Are the Happiest Cities in the World?

    Where Are the Happiest Cities in the World?

    For the first time, the 2020 World Happiness Report ranked 186 cities worldwide in terms of their level of subjective well-being. Moreover, by looking at the Gallup World Poll data across more than 160 countries and 99% of the world’s population, we can now tell which city’s residents evaluated their current life the highest. Well, at least how they evaluated their life satisfaction before the COVID-19 pandemic hit.

    If you want to determine your life satisfaction, you could also ask yourself: “imagine yourself on a ladder with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top. Zero represents the worst possible life, and ten is the best possible life. Which step would you put yourself on based on your life currently?”

    Here are the top 20 cities, based on their inhabitants’ responses to the above question:

    1. Helsinki, Finland = 7.828 average
    2. Aarhus, Denmark = 7.625 average
    3. Wellington, New Zealand = 7.553 average
    4. Zurich, Switzerland = 7.541 average
    5. Copenhagen, Denmark = 7.530 average
    6. Bergen, Norway = 7.527 average
    7. Olso, Norway = 7.464 average
    8. Tel Aviv, Israel = 7.461 average
    9. Stockholm, Sweden = 7.373 average
    10. Brisbane, Australia = 7.337 average
    11. San Jose, Costa Rica = 7.321 average
    12. Reykjavik, Iceland = 7.317 average
    13. Toronto, Canada = 7.298 average
    14. Melbourne, Australia = 7.296 average
    15. Perth, Australia = 7.253 average
    16. Auckland, New Zealand = 7.232 average
    17. Christchurch, New Zealand = 7.191 average
    18. Washington, USA = 7.185 average
    19. Dallas, USA = 7.155 average
    20. Sydney, Australia = 7.133 average

    Scandinavian cities dominate, with more than half of the top ten cities worldwide. Australia’s happiest city is Brisbane, but three other Australian cities make the top 20, with Melbourne beating Sydney (yes!). NZ also fares pretty well, with Wellington the happiest city outside of Finland and Denmark and Auckland and Christchurch in the top 20. The happiest city in the US is Washington DC, surprisingly at #18, with Dallas just behind it in 19th.

    Which Cities Are Improving their Happiness Levels the Most?

    Here are the top ten cities with the biggest improvement in life satisfaction from 2005 to 2018:

    1. Abidjan, Ivory Coast = 0.981 average increase in subjective well-being
    2. Dushanbe, Tajikstan = 0.950 average improvement
    3. Vilnius, Lithuania = 0.939 improvement
    4. Almaty, Kazakstan = 0.922 improvement
    5. Cotonou, Benin = 0.918 improvement
    6. Sofia, Bulgaria = 0.899 improvement
    7. Dakar, Senegal = 0.864 improvement
    8. Conakry, Guinea = 0.833 improvement
    9. Niamey, Niger = 0.812 improvement
    10. Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo = 0.787 improvement

    Some of the most significant subjective well-being improvements come from Africa, with six out of the top 10 cities. Central Asia and Eastern Europe are the other two main areas with the most significant jumps in subjective well-being in the 21st Century.

    Which Cities Feel the Most Hopeful About the Future?

    Below are the top ten most optimistic cities and how they imagine their subjective well-being will be in the future:

    1. Tashkent, Uzbekistan = 8.390 average future subjective well-being
    2. San Miguelito, Panama = 8.372 average
    3. San Jose, Costa Rica = 8.347 average
    4. Accra, Ghana = 8.297 average
    5. Panama City, Panama = 8.286 average
    6. Aarhus, Denmark = 8.286 average
    7. Copenhagen, Denmark = 8.208 average
    8. Helsinki, Finland = 8.206 average
    9. Atlanta, USA = 8.204 average
    10. Freetown, Sierra Leone = 8.203 average

    Central America seems to be very optimistic about its future, especially the two countries of Panama and Costa Rica. Atlanta is the only USA city to crack the top ten in any category in this article, and Scandinavia remains hopeful about improving things as we advance, especially Denmark and Finland. Tashkent in Uzbekistan comes out of nowhere to win this category, although Central Asia has improved its subjective well-being over the last 15 years. Finally, Ghana and Sierra Leone expect that things will continue to improve for them, with greater levels of happiness predicted in their cities than anywhere in Australia or Western Europe in the future.

    Which Cities Experience the Most Positive Emotions?

    Here are the top ten cities in the world with the highest levels of positive affect:

    1. Asuncion, Paraguay = .892/1
    2. Mogadishu, Somalia = .877/1
    3. Vientiane, Laos = .873/1
    4. San Pedro Sula, Honduras = .867/1
    5. Quito, Ecuador = .862/1
    6. San Jose, Costa Rica = .860/1
    7. Cork, Ireland = .857/1
    8. Reykjavik, Iceland = .855/1
    9. Santiago, Chile = .853/1
    10. Montevideo, Uruguay = .850/1

    These rankings are from people’s responses to the positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). The 10-item positive affect scale measures how much people describe feeling active, alert, attentive, determined, enthusiastic, excited, inspired, interested, proud and strong on a 5-point scale from 1 = not at all to 5 = very much. South American cities seem to rate relatively high on this scale, with Asuncion in Paraguay winning by quite a bit, Quito in Ecuador landing in the top 5, and Santiago in Chile and Montevideo in Uruguay rounding out the top 10. Central America has two cities in the top 6, with Somalia having the only city from Africa, Laos the only city from Asia, and Ireland and Iceland representing Europe.

    Which Cities Report the Fewest Negative Emotions?

    The top ten cities with the lowest levels of negative affect:

    1. Taipei, Taiwan = .110/1
    2. Prishtine, Kosovo = 0.132/1
    3. Shanghai, China = 0.140/1
    4. Talinn, Estonia = 0.144/1
    5. Singapore = 0.144/1
    6. Ashgabat, Turkmenistan = 0.144/1
    7. Baku, Azerbaijan = 0.145/1
    8. Wellington, New Zealand = 0.152/1
    9. Almaty, Kazakhstan = 0.158/1
    10. Moscow, Russia = 0.159/1

    These rankings are also from people’s responses to the PANAS. The 10-item negative affect scale assesses how much people report feeling afraid, ashamed, distressed, guilty, hostile, irritable, jittery, nervous, scared and upset on a 5-point scale from 1 = not at all to 5 = very much. Unlike many other findings, Asia and Eastern Europe come out on top, with no sign of African or North, Central or South American countries in the top 10. Taiwan, China and Singapore all rank in the top 5, indicating low levels of negatively reported emotions in this region. Unfortunately, low negative affectivity doesn’t result in super high levels of reported happiness or life satisfaction. The only city to rank in the top 10 in any other section is Wellington, New Zealand.

    Conclusion

    If you want to go where people are most satisfied with their life, Finland is the place to be, as it has been rated the happiest country in the world for three years now. Of course, Helsinki also takes the crown as the city with the highest life satisfaction at present, but other cities in Scandinavia aren’t too far behind.

    When you explore the data a little further, it gets a bit more complicated as to where the happiest places in the world are. No Australian city ranks in the top 10 globally for the recent improvement in life satisfaction, optimism about life satisfaction in the future, or levels of positive or negative affectivity. Only one US city (Atlanta for optimism about the future) makes the top ten for any of these categories, and UK countries are nowhere near the top.

    Conversely, there are many cities in Africa and Central Asia where well-being has improved quickly over the last 15 years. Their citizens remain excited about the potential for what is yet to come. None more so than Tashkent in Uzbekistan. Central America also has several cities that feel happy and hopeful about their future, especially Panama, Costa Rica and Honduras.

    Based on the findings, South America has the most cities that report a lot of positive emotions in the present, and Asia and Eastern Europe win out on minimal negative emotions. Personally, living somewhere with minimally reported negative emotions and a high level of life satisfaction sounds pretty good to me.

  • Which Values Are Most Important in Your Country?

    Which Values Are Most Important in Your Country?

    Below are the findings from the seventh wave of the World Values Survey. My dad is from the US, and my mum is Australian, so I was curious to see how much I have been influenced by what people value in these countries:

    Inglehart-Welzel Cultural Map (2020)

    Neither Australia nor the USA is the most traditional or secular of all the countries surveyed. The USA is about as close to the middle as possible, showing a slight preference for Secular Values over Traditional Values (about 0.10 standard deviations above the average). Australia is more secular than both the USA and the world average.

    Neither are Australia nor the USA the highest in terms of Self-Expression or Survival Values. The USA is just under 1.5 standard deviations higher than the world average regarding Self-Expression Values. Australia also prefers Self-Expression over Survival Values and is about 2.35 standard deviations above the average, putting them in the top 2.5% of all countries endorsing these values.

    Traditional vs. Secular Values

    For the Y-axis, more traditional countries value the importance of family, religion and deferring to and being respectful of authority. Therefore, they tend to be more hostile toward divorce, abortion, and euthanasia. Countries that are more secular place less emphasis on traditional family values, religion and authority. Divorce, abortion, and euthanasia are more acceptable than in countries with traditional values.

    Australia is approximately 0.55 on the Y-axis. It means that it is half a standard deviation more secular than traditional. Australia is more secular than the UK and many countries in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. Qatar has the most traditional values, but Ghana, Tanzania, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Trinidad and many others are too.

    Australia is more traditional than all Scandinavian countries, some Catholic European countries (especially the Czech Republic), and nearly all Confucian countries. Interestingly, Japan and South Korea are two of the highest-ranked countries globally regarding Secular Values and are less traditional than any country in Europe. I was surprised by this finding, as my Sociology lecturers at university often used Asian countries (including Japan) as exemplars of collectivist cultures. People in collectivist cultures put the goals and needs of the group, including what the authorities and their families say, over their individual needs and desires. Yet, their traditional — secular continuum findings do not indicate that for Confucian countries.

    Survival vs. Self-Expression Values

    Findings on the X-axis are also significant. For example, countries that endorse Survival Values prioritise physical and economic security over self-expression. As a result, they are less trusting and tolerant of outsiders or people who don’t fit in with what the average person does.

    Countries that endorse Self-Expression Values, on the other hand, prioritise environmental protection and want more extensive participation in political and economic life decision-making. They also exhibit greater acceptance of differences and equality for anyone previously discriminated against, whether based on country of origin, sexuality or gender.

    People from South Korea endorse Survival Values more than Self-Expression Values (approximately -0.50). Australia’s preference for Self-Expression Values (about 2.35) compared to Asian countries might also help explain why Asian countries were referred to in my Sociology lectures as examples of collectivist cultures. However, other countries, especially Egypt and Zimbabwe in Africa, endorse Security Values more than all Asian countries. Both Vietnam and Japan also show a decent preference for Self-Expression over Security Values. Perhaps my university Sociology professors were influenced by inaccurate stereotypes or did not use the best examples.

    Based on their answers to the World Values Survey and their positions on the above map, the average Australian is more likely to be happy, accept homosexuality, sign a petition and trust others than the average Japanese person or individual from the USA. Furthermore, the average American or Japanese person is more likely to endorse these four characteristics than the average Egyptian. However, the average individual from nearly every country is less likely to support Self-Expression Values than the average Swede or Norwegian. These Scandinavian countries are the top two globally, just ahead of Iceland, Denmark and New Zealand.

    Which Areas of Life are Most Important?

    As a dual citizen of Australia and the USA, I will include each country’s results on the following questions to the countries that most and least endorsed each item as very important. Here are six areas of life that the World Values Survey asks people about in terms of how important they are to them:

    1. How important is your family in your life?

    The country with the highest percentage of people who endorse family as very important: Egypt = 99.7%

    USA = 91.0%

    Australia = 90.2%

    The country with the lowest percentage of respondents who endorse family as very important: Nicaragua = 77.8%

    2. How important are friends in your life?

    The country with the highest percentage of people who endorse friends as very important: Serbia = 62.6%

    Australia = 52.4%

    USA = 50.7%

    The country with the lowest percentage of respondents who endorse friends as very important: Myanmar = 11.8%

    3. How important is leisure time in your life?

    The country with the highest percentage of people who endorse leisure time as very important: Nigeria = 67.5%

    Australia = 42.8%

    USA = 39.5%

    The country with the lowest percentage of respondents who endorse leisure time as very important: Vietnam = 12.8%

    4. How important is politics in your life?

    The country with the highest percentage of people who endorse politics as very important: Nigeria = 34.8%

    USA = 14.9%

    Australia = 10.3%

    The country with the lowest percentage of respondents who endorse politics as very important: Serbia = 4.4%

    5. How important is work in your life?

    The country with the highest percentage of people who endorse work as very important: Indonesia = 92.9%

    USA = 39.4%

    Australia = 33.1%

    The country with the lowest percentage of respondents who endorse work as very important: New Zealand = 29.1%

    6. How important is religion in your life?

    The country with the highest percentage of people who endorse religion as very important: Indonesia = 98.1%

    USA = 37.1%

    Australia = 13.8%

    The country with the lowest percentage of respondents who endorse religion as very important: China = 3.3%

    Neither Australia nor the USA is the highest or lowest country regarding endorsing any of the six categories as very important in their life. It’s nice to see that family, friends and leisure time are all considered more important in life in the USA and Australia than work, religion and politics. However, I wonder if everyone lives in line with what values they say are most important to them.

    Dr Damon Ashworth

    Clinical Psychologist